Phil. Jury Hears Arguments For Risperdal Breast Growth Case

Phil. Jury Hears Arguments For Risperdal Breast Growth Case

Introduction

A Risperdal lawsuit involving claims filed by a 23-year-old man against Janssen Pharmaceutica is currently underway in Philadelphia Court. This is the first case in the nation to allow punitive damages if the jury rules in favor of the plaintiff. The jury heard arguments for the case on Tuesday, January 29.

The plaintiff's attorney presented to the jurors a photo of the plaintiff as a child and pointed that the nine-year-old had developed female breasts, a condition known as gynecomastia, and told it occurred due to the antipsychotic drug, Risperdal. In his argument, the attorney asserted that the company was aware of the drug's abnormal breast growth side-effect but chose to hide the fact from doctors and patients. The attorney called Janssen's conduct as intentional, outrageous, and completely focussed on seeking profit and sales. The defendant's lawyer argued the jurors take note of the evidence and told them that the doctor and the plaintiff's family were adequately warned about the possible side-effects of the drug. She maintained that the plaintiff was diagnosed with various mental illnesses during his childhood and the doctor who prescribed Risperdal considered it as an appropriate medication for him.

Two coordinated actions have been filed for Risperdal cases: one in Los Angeles Superior Court (Risperdal and Invega Product Liability Cases, JCCP 4775, presided by Honorable William Highberger) and the other in Philadelphia (In Re: Risperdal Litigation, March 2010 Term, Case No. 100300296).