Skip to main content

Plaintiffs Urge Appellate Revival of Zostavax Shingles Suits

Plaintiffs Urge Appellate Revival of Zostavax Shingles Suits

Plaintiffs Urge Appellate Revival of Zostavax Shingles Suits

Introduction

Hundreds of plaintiffs have requested the federal court to reinstate their Zostavax shingles lawsuits which were earlier dismissed by the judge due to lack of evidence.

In each of the claims, Merck, manufacturer of Zostavax shingles was accused of being responsible for the plaintiffs' development of severe variations of the ailment that the shingles vaccination was meant to prevent.

Even though such testing was never done and cannot be done after the fact, the U.S. District Judge presiding over the litigation required each plaintiff to provide PCR evidence establishing that their shingles was linked to the live strain of the virus contained in the vaccine before allowing the cases to proceed.

As the first shingles vaccine licensed for use in the United States, Merck released Zostavax in 2006. It featured a single injection containing a live virus that was meant to stop the onset of the uncomfortable illness. The vaccine was allegedly designed improperly and poses an unreasonable risk because the live virus was not sufficiently weakened, leading to more severe and prolonged shingles outbreaks in some users as well as a number of neurological issues, autoimmune diseases, vision loss, and hearing loss, according to lawsuits.

All Zostavax lawsuits have been consolidated before a U.S. District Judge in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania as part of federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), where several groups of "bellwether" cases involving various categories of injuries were prepared for trial. This was done because similar questions of fact and law were raised in complaints filed throughout the federal court system.

A "Group A" bellwether pool handled around 1,200 cases involving individuals who claimed they had injuries or acquired shingles after getting the injection. As a result of the Court excluding expert witness testimony connecting the live virus vaccination to the reactivation of the shingles virus that had been dormant in recipients, the court dismissed all Group A cases involving shingles litigation after pretrial discovery.

As a result, the only cases remaining active in the MDL are those involving injuries that are part of a "Group B" bellwether pool for plaintiffs who developed other autoimmune disorders, such as postherpetic neuralgia, acute disseminated encephalopmyelitis (ADEM), paralysis, traverse myelitis, meningitis, hemorrhagic strokes and other injuries, or a "Group C" pool, for individuals who developed hearing loss from Zostavax.

Comments

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.

Latest News

Court Approves $700M Opioid Settlement for Acute Hospitals

Categories: Opioids

A federal court has approved a $700 million class-action settlement that will compensate over 1,000 acute care hospitals for costs related to the opioid crisis.

The settlement consolidates four separate agreements involving major drug…

Philips Settles CPAP Lawsuits Over Toxic Foam for $1.1B

Philips has been embroiled in legal battles following the recall of millions of CPAP, BiPAP, and ventilator devices due to toxic foam degradation.

The breakdown of the foam in these machines may release harmful chemicals, raising serious…

Texas Trial to Decide J&J’s $10B Talcum Powder Settlement

Categories: Talcum

A high-stakes trial in Texas will determine whether Johnson & Johnson (J&J) can resolve tens of thousands of talcum powder cancer lawsuits through a…

🎁 March VIP Medical Record Review Offer – Get 300 Pages Free!         
Includes a Free Life Care Plan Report + 10% Off Future Reviews!

Only 15 Firms Accepted.